Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 12, 2020. It is now read-only.

How does this relate to Source Generators from MS? #229

Closed
ugumba opened this issue May 6, 2020 · 7 comments · Fixed by #238
Closed

How does this relate to Source Generators from MS? #229

ugumba opened this issue May 6, 2020 · 7 comments · Fixed by #238
Labels

Comments

@ugumba
Copy link

ugumba commented May 6, 2020

https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/introducing-c-source-generators

Will CodeGeneration.Roslyn be made redundant, or are there any important differences?

@amis92 amis92 added the question label May 6, 2020
@amis92
Copy link
Collaborator

amis92 commented May 6, 2020

Source Generators will make this project redundant indeed.

There are differences, but not considerable enough to give this project any life support in future.

@amis92 amis92 pinned this issue May 6, 2020
@garyng
Copy link

garyng commented May 15, 2020

This makes me feel kinda sad...

@AArnott
Copy link
Owner

AArnott commented May 16, 2020

I'm glad this project has been helpful to you, @garyng.

@LokiMidgard
Copy link
Contributor

@AArnott as you said you don't want to maintain this anymor, maybe mention that in the README. I think you can also set something in github to mark it as no longer maintained.

@AArnott
Copy link
Owner

AArnott commented Dec 9, 2020

@amis92 Are you ready to archive this project as well? Or are you interested in maintaining it any longer?

@amis92
Copy link
Collaborator

amis92 commented Dec 9, 2020

I am ready to archive it.

so long and thanks for all the fish meme

Let's throw in a couple of links to the Source Generators into the Readme and call it done ☺️

@AArnott
Copy link
Owner

AArnott commented Dec 9, 2020

Let the record show that @amis92 really carried this project forward for the last 2+ years. Mega thanks!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants