You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Viits HLS fails for the second example in docs/source/overlay_design_methodology/overlay_tutorial.ipynb, old Vivado IP cannot be used with new Vivado since 2020.2, and bitstreams generated using older VIvado fail with output all zeros on newer Pynq (e.g. 3.0 but probably 2.7 as well). This is likely due to the differences in stream handling between Vivado HLS and Vitis HLS, e.g. comparing the AXIS with side channel examples in UG902 & UG1399 2020.1.
Viits HLS fails for the second example in docs/source/overlay_design_methodology/overlay_tutorial.ipynb, old Vivado IP cannot be used with new Vivado since 2020.2, and bitstreams generated using older VIvado fail with output all zeros on newer Pynq (e.g. 3.0 but probably 2.7 as well). This is likely due to the differences in stream handling between Vivado HLS and Vitis HLS, e.g. comparing the AXIS with side channel examples in UG902 & UG1399 2020.1.
I suggest that the example for latest Pynq be updated to point to e.g. https://discuss.pynq.io/t/tutorial-using-a-hls-stream-ip-with-dma-part-1-hls-design/3344.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: