-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 109
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sponsors tiers refreshment #684
Comments
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴 It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation. There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model. Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here. Thank you for your patience ❤️ |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴 It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation. There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model. Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here. Thank you for your patience ❤️ |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴 It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation. There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model. Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here. Thank you for your patience ❤️ |
cc @derberg |
yup, in progres if folks wanna learn more, please join Slack and our Marketing Working Group |
As per @ChristopheDujarric advice shared during Marketing WG meeting, instead of focusing on tiers, let's first list items that could show up in Logo visibilityBrand awareness and SEO. Logo must have a good file name with sponsor's name and we need to ask for proper Note There is one sponsor that sponsors us just because of this SEO topic We should not promise that we will increase traffic to sponsor website - that is not the goal
BadgeSponsor badge that sponsor can show on their website or slides or socials. A confirmation they are sponsor, and what kind of sponsor. Note There are sponsors that put effort in showing how much they support open source initiatives. Sometimes companies have Open Source Program Office that takes care of these things and badge would be useful for them. Also some sponsors are proud to support AsyncAPI and they could use it on social media. And last but not least I know at least one sponsor that would have it on sales slides. Conference sponsorship discountsWe can offer different levels of discounts to be AsyncAPI Conference sponsor. Always make it clear that these are multiple events throughout the year so logo of sponsor and name of sponsor is regularly mentioned and visible. Also Social mediaPost on AsyncAPI social media accounts. We promise to:
Newsletter and status update blogSponsor announcement, one-time visibility for the sponsor, like in the case of social media post. We promise to:
Priority for hosting AsyncAPI Conf on TourAsyncAPI Conf on Tour is a set of events around the world, hosted in different locations, might be some sponsor office, or dedicated space at some conference. It is still community-driven, but a good feature for sponsor to show their engagement with the project. If there is a company that wants to host the event but they are not sponsors, they will not be selected if some sponsor want to do it. Dedicated sponsorship announcement with blog postDedicated blog post on asyncapi.com/blog with explanation on why you sponsor, no marketing. Dedicated sponsorship announcement as live streamProperly marketed live stream, that can be prerecorded, that is in a form of an interview, on why sponsor supports the proejct. It gives more visibility than just a blog post, because we announce that it will take place, so extra social media posts are done before it. Product placementDifferent options here:
Something we would probably have to confirm with Linux Foundation 🤔 or just at least double check if some FOSS project does that already. Note Some sponsors already asked for it when we talked about "what would convince them to pay more" Marketing Advisory BoardMaybe we could offer that every sponsor by default gets invited to Marketing Working Group. They delegate someone to join conversations. We in exchange offer to transform the group into a meeting that follows Chatham House Rule. Meetings would not be recorded, no AI connected and there would be no risk that some sensitive company/speaker content could be leaking to the public without control. These meetings would probably go outside Marketing Working Group as for now, anyone can join WG but because of Chatham House and privacy concerns, we would have to limit the audience of the meeting The board would not make any decisions, but it could share official recommendations on various topics:
For us, it would be a great opportunity to get sponsors closer involved, and making sure they extend their support. Also, these would be usually very experienced people in marketing and not only - so having their opinion that would be focused on AsyncAPI context would be super helpful What else do you think we could offer? |
We need to set timelines. If we are to prioritize them, they must decide before the end of the first quarter of the year if they want to sponsor for that particular year.
So far everything looks good, @iambami maybe pick a few things here for the 2025 AsyncAPI Conf prospectus |
for conference prospectus, there is also option for sponsored talk |
Reason/Context
We have sponsor tiers that were setup like 4 years ago and we need to refresh:
Postman
shows up as Platinum, although they do not pay money directly but sponsor full time maintainersDescription
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: