Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updates from GitLab #166

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Updates from GitLab #166

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

eveenhuis
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

bjrichardwebster and others added 5 commits November 21, 2024 13:06
Added a guide for maintainers to sync GitLab to GitHub.

See merge request jatic/kitware/xaitk-saliency!5
Fix package pinning and regenerate lock file

See merge request jatic/kitware/xaitk-saliency!7
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 26, 2024

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.70%. Comparing base (c0f3b7c) to head (a2e097c).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #166   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.70%   99.70%           
=======================================
  Files          57       57           
  Lines        2375     2375           
=======================================
  Hits         2368     2368           
  Misses          7        7           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 99.70% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@eveenhuis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bjrichardwebster CI is still running as I write this, but ghostflow has already failed. If CI fails on GitHub (after passing on GitLab) what do you want the resolution strategy to be? Hopefully it doesn't happen too often, but clearly it's not impossible

@bjrichardwebster
Copy link
Contributor

@bjrichardwebster CI is still running as I write this, but ghostflow has already failed. If CI fails on GitHub (after passing on GitLab) what do you want the resolution strategy to be? Hopefully it doesn't happen too often, but clearly it's not impossible

When I was testing this out, I actually pushed to a PR to test it out actually, so I didn't catch this. What I thought about though in general is that there are required tests on github that we don't/can't have on gitlab, one of which is ghostflow. I believe that all of these will be very small fixes that the maintainers should be able to fix quickly. This ghostflow failure is an example where it is a bunch of trailing white space. That said, we should look at why all that exists and proprogate it back into devel-jatic when appropriate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants