Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rm ArrayBuffer.resize polyfill when Firefox supports it by default #642

Open
mishig25 opened this issue Apr 29, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Rm ArrayBuffer.resize polyfill when Firefox supports it by default #642

mishig25 opened this issue Apr 29, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@mishig25
Copy link
Collaborator

mishig25 commented Apr 29, 2024

from #638 (comment)

According to caniuse page, the support is experimental on version 124 (current version) of firefox (can be enabled via a flag). So I think it's expected to be stable on 125. Unfortunate I couldn't find the issue tracker anywhere so I can't confirm that information.

In any way, I feel like this API is relative new on all other browsers, so it's maybe better to keep this polyfill for a while.

cc: @ngxson @julien-c

@ngxson
Copy link
Member

ngxson commented Apr 29, 2024

A small correction is that I'm not sure if Firefox 125 will have it enabled by default or not. Would you mind to change the title for clarification @mishig25 ? Something like: Rm ArrayBuffer.resize polyfill when Firefox supports it by default

Thanks in advance.

@mishig25 mishig25 changed the title Rm ArrayBuffer.resize pilyfill after Fiirefox version 124 Rm ArrayBuffer.resize polyfill when Firefox supports it by default Apr 29, 2024
@mishig25
Copy link
Collaborator Author

done so 👍

@ngxson
Copy link
Member

ngxson commented May 5, 2024

Update Firefox 125 is out, but support for .resize is still experimental: https://caniuse.com/?search=ArrayBuffer.resize

@mishig25
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mishig25 commented May 6, 2024

but support for .resize is still experimental

let's keep the polyfill until .resize is in stable mode

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants