Add kep for LQ defauling #3652
Add kep for LQ defauling #3652
Conversation
k8s-ci-robot
added
release-note-none
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: yaroslava-serdiuk The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
size/M
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue canceled.
|
yaroslava-serdiuk
force-pushed
the
lq-default-kep
branch
from
efc4dd2
to
be70ff5
Compare
|
|
||
| - create a default LocalQueue. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Proposal |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we clarify what CQ does the default LQ will refer to?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The admin creates a default LQ manually, so they will specify CQ.
The feature only add default LQ to the job if it exists in the namespace.
| manageJobsWithoutQueueName doesn't work with this feature, since Kueue add the LocalQueue | ||
| annotation. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Risks and Mitigations |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Does this proposal results in every Job created in a namespace will be managed by Kueue?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If the feature gate is enabled and default LQ is created in a namespace, then yes.
What type of PR is this?
/kind documentation
What this PR does / why we need it:
issue #2936
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
cc: @mimowo @mwielgus @PBundyra