Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

0.9.0 #78

Open
wants to merge 284 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

0.9.0 #78

wants to merge 284 commits into from

Conversation

jonschlinkert
Copy link
Member

There is still work to do, but this is going to be a lot easier to use than the current verb! I'll add some descriptive comments soon....

@mightyiam
Copy link

@jonschlinkert this is a huge change. I hope you're keeping this up. I have high hopes.

@jonschlinkert
Copy link
Member Author

I hope you're keeping this up. I have high hopes.

I am indeed! very much so. It's not always easy to see the connection between related projects, but I'm making commits to the underlying libs that verb uses. I can't wait to share this next release with the world, it's pretty awesome if I do say so myself lol :)

@jonschlinkert
Copy link
Member Author

@mightyiam you might be able to download this now and test is if you want :)

NOTE that:

  • license no longer a helper by default, it's just a property. You can make it a helper if you want, or just change {%= license() %} to {%= license %} in .verb.md
  • I haven't gotten to the apidocs helper yet. I'll be doing that tomorrow.

Also, if you (or anyone) wants to try this out and give feedback on an or all of the following that would be great:

  • download verb: npm i -g verb
  • run verb in the command line in a project that has a .verb.md (make sure you note the changes above)
  • verb should prompt you for basic info
  • if you run verb again in that project, it should not prompt you again
  • try doing verb --init in the same project
  • try doing verb --ask, then try verb --ask=name, then try verb --ask=name,description
  • then run verb again with no commands, it should use your last answers

Thanks!

@adoyle-h
Copy link

How is the project going on? I have waited a long time for the new release.

@tunnckoCore
Copy link

@adoyle-h just use that branch. No need to wait, this PR is about years old and couple of users already uses 0.9 from the beginning.

@jonschlinkert
Copy link
Member Author

prs and docs are welcome!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants