-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proof of creditworthiness short use case per issue #137 #156
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ | ||||||
<dt> | ||||||
<udef>F.6 Proof of creditworthiness</udef> | ||||||
</dt> | ||||||
<dd> | ||||||
<p>Alice has checking and saving accounts, loans, and credit cards at multiple banks. Due to local regulatory restrictions, the banks may not exchange information about the subjects they issue credit cards to.</p> | ||||||
|
||||||
<p>To prove her creditworthiness when applying for a mortgage, Alice acquires verifiable credentials issued by each bank containing type and balance for each account. She creates a verifiable presentation aggregating all accounts (type and balance) without revealing any issuers of the underlying data.</p> | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The phrase underlying data reads to me as if the VP is doing a selective disclosure over the data in the VCs, but I don't believe we have a mechanism for that.
Suggested change
What we could do is pass the balance and bank info on, while avoiding the legacy approach of providing bank statements with all the account transactions. Or maybe something with zksnarks to add a custom predicate to the VP, but I haven't seen anyone work through those details. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Per our conversation today, let's look at a set of selectively disclosable verifiable credentials which comprise a 3 year history of bank activity (one statement per months). Using predicate proofs, our hero is able to demonstrate that in each and every month they maintained a balance of at least $50,000 USD, without revealing the actual balance values nor the actual transactions. |
||||||
</dd> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.